Not All Accommodations Are Allowed on Standardized Testing

 Each year when you have your child’s annual IEP meeting, there’s a place that you need to sign that you understand that not all accommodations that your child might have on their IEP are allowable during standardized testing. Did you know that? This reminds me of Procedural Safeguards. Every year you sign a paper that says that you understand your Procedural Safeguards, but quite often when I ask a parent about that, they tell me that they didn’t sign it, when in reality, they did. It is extremely important that you know and understand what you are signing during these meetings.

Accommodations Not Allowed for Statewide Testing

Standardized testing is meant to see how children measure up against the so-called “norm”. Most of us within the disability community despise that thought because we realize, probably better than most, that everyone is different, and everyone has a different learning style and a different pace at which they learn. So, while this testing may seem ridiculous, it is the tool that the system uses to measure progress, or lack thereof. While most children with disabilities receive special education, at some level, they are often the same ones that score below expectations of children at their grade level, and this is not simply because they have a disability. Oftentimes it’s related to subpar instruction that they receive and how their abilities are not equally considered with their disabilities. There’s a saying that children should be taught in the way that they learn, but sadly, that doesn’t seem to be the predominant experience by children with special needs

If you want to see a list of accommodations that are allowed, you can go to this link. For this week’s informational e-mail, I wanted to share some of the things that are NOT allowed on standardized tests because I have actually seen quite a few children lately whose schools don’t even seem aware of the non-allowable accommodations. This means that parents cannot solely depend upon their schools to implement what’s found in the IEP and need to gain as much info as possible to keep a step ahead.

When a student uses an accommodation that is not allowed, the test results may be declared invalid by the state if it is found out (FDOE, 2017a; 2017b). Examples include the following:

• Oral presentation by a test administrator or text-to-speech for passages in statewide standardized assessments reading and writing items
• Signed presentation for passages in statewide standardized assessments reading and writing items
• Use of devices to check spelling or grammar
• Use of a calculator for computation in grades 3-6 statewide standardized assessments in mathematics
• Use of multiplication charts or tables
• Use of manipulative materials except when approved for use with braille materials
• Use of assistive devices that violate the purpose of the test
• Unlimited time to complete a test session
• Peer assistance

This list is not all inclusive, but it focuses on the ones that tend to get people into trouble if they’re not aware of them. These are allowed within the classroom setting during teaching times, but are not allowable on standardized testing. In a nutshell, when a student is taking a reading test, they have to read the passage. The point of that assessment is to determine if the student can actually read the words and figure out what those words mean. No one can read the passage to the child as an allowable accommodation. That is why it is so vitally important that children learn how to read. To be clear, children don’t learn how to read in order to take a test. Children learn how to read so they can gain information from the written word. If that is not happening with your child – if they are not learning how to read – contact your school and ask for the literacy coach to conduct a reading assessment to determine why they’re not reading and to make recommendations for a curriculum that best meets their learning style.

One More Thing

There is something called a Unique Accommodation. According to the Dept of Education, Students with severe deficits in decoding that result in “nonreaders” as defined by the FLDOE as:
▪ Based on the child’s response to already attempted services and accommodations.
▪ Documented evidence, after exhausting all less intense services, that the student can only demonstrate their reading and writing knowledge with this unique accommodation. The successful use of this unique accommodation must be shown in the classroom prior to being considered for use on any state assessment.

The Eligibility Requirements Are:

• Documented severe deficit in decoding
• Current IEP
• Evidence-based intervention in Tier 1 and Tier 2 DAILY instruction to access printed text
• Data to support the student’s effective use of a reader, audio recordings or text to speech through a reading accommodation assessment
• Shows proficient scores in daily instruction (formative and summative assessments) when the audible accommodation is used

This “unique” accommodation might sound good, but it’s not to be considered until after every effort has been put forth to help your child learn to read for themselves.

I hope this has been helpful. Please share with others who may benefit from this type of information.

A Dozen Red Flags of a Hot Mess IEP Meeting :o

For many parents, the annual IEP meeting is something that incites a great sense of overwhelm, frustration and doom. This is probably one of the reasons that tons of parents don’t even show up. Most of you might find this really hard to believe (because you’re passionately involved in your child’s education), but it’s true, there are schools where less than 25% of the families attend the annual IEP meeting ☹

This not only has a negative effect on their own child’s education, but it impacts other families as well. Think about it… If you are the only parent asking for paraprofessional support so that your child can be successfully included in a regular classroom, that could be the reason they look at you like you’re a crazy person as they tell you that, “Nobody gets that here.” When we ALL show up, systemic change is possible.

 

LOOK OUT!

There are some things to watch out for when it comes to IEP meetings. Being familiar with these in advance will help you recognize what’s possible and how to circumvent certain issues BEFORE they pop up:

 

-          The school calls to set the annual meeting within 3-5 days of the due date. This generally means that they nearly forgot all about you and are scrambling to get it done, OR they typically wing-it and don’t put much thought or emphasis into planning in advance.

-          If you’re in a school district that gives parents a draft of the IEP a week before the meeting, and it’s nowhere to be found, this is cause for concern.

-          The goals in the IEP, or worse yet, the Present Level of Performance, has another student’s name in it. This means that it’s a copy and paste and that the plan isn’t as “individualized” as you might think.

-          The Present Level of Performance only includes testing data from the assessment that they MUST do for all students – state standardized tests. But tests that actually show how your child thinks or what they CAN do are not included.

-          You get to the meeting, and they inform you that they have 30 minutes to get an annual IEP done when this is the first time you’re seeing any information on current assessments or the proposed goals.

-          Before you get to the meeting, the person who runs your IEP meetings tells you that the services will remain as is. That’s called Predetermination and is not permitted in IEP meetings. Do NOT let this happen.  Your input is required under federal law.

-          Goals are generic and you’re not really sure what will be measured to determine if the goal has been mastered. This could be like, “Johnny will know how to make new friends in a year’s time.”

-          There are missing members of the IEP team, or they breeze in and out while the meeting is taking place. The IEP team has 5 required members – for ALL IEP teams (parent/student, general education teacher, special education teacher, local education agency representative, evaluation specialist)

-          You ask for data supporting the claims of the IEP, and team members look at one another as though to say, “You have that information, right?”

-          The same goals appear on your IEP year after year. Students are covered by a law that says that they should make meaningful progress, which is different for each kid, but “meaningful” is not what the supreme court refers to as “de minimis”, which is an ever-so-slight improvement.

-          No one seems to have any answers when you ask, “What else can be done to help my son learn how to read?” (or other areas of learning)

-          Every IEP meeting should include discussion about inclusive education, no matter who your child is and what their needs are. After all, the goal of special education in general is to give kids what they need SO THAT they can be more prepared for a regular education environment. Waiting for the child to change who they are is NOT the answer. It’s the system that needs to change to accommodate the needs of the child. Some kids are included all day, some for just a portion, but the goal for all kids is to move in the direction of the least restrictive environment. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

 

Remember that the IEP is a federally enforced document that gives you and your child protections like nothing else can. If it’s not written, it’s as if it wasn’t discussed, so don’t just talk about it… document it. A great way to do that is to utilize the Parent Input section, which is HUGELY important. Here is where you want to document what your concerns are, what you think your child needs and what you’re providing outside of the school setting. Oftentimes, when a parent puts their concerns and requests in this section, it motivates the rest of the team to get more creative in securing the education that your child deserves. 

Need some guidance?  https://staceyhoaglund.com/